Platform comparison / Research edition

Five platforms. Different trade-offs.

Compare the cost model, the controls and the path out. The right shortlist starts with what your organisation cannot compromise on.

Last reviewed 14 October 2026 · App Build Index research
A different starting point

Betty Blocks

A governed route for business teams working with IT.[1]

A different starting point

Mendix

A structured environment for a mixed development team.[1]

A different starting point

OutSystems

A route for complex applications owned by a delivery team.[1]

A different starting point

Power Apps

A practical shortlist candidate in a Microsoft estate.[1]

A different starting point

Lovable

A fast starting point with a conventional code handover.[1]

Sample evaluation · every cell needs vendor validation before procurement
Decision dimensionBetty BlocksMendixOutSystemsPower AppsLovable
Cost modelStrong
Platform fee; scope matters[1]
Partial
Platform licence + delivery[1]
Weak
Platform licence + delivery[1]
Strong
Seats and capacity[1]
Strong
Subscription + usage[1]
AI meteringStrong
Included scope to confirm[1]
Partial
Plan-dependent[1]
Weak
Plan-dependent[1]
Strong
Credits / capacity[1]
Strong
Usage credits[1]
Exit & lock-inStrong
Self-serve code export (React + Wasm), June 2026[1]
Partial
Specialist migration work[1]
Partial
Review runtime dependencies[1]
Weak
Microsoft ecosystem coupling[1]
Strong
Code handover to verify[1]
Leave without a rebuild?
Yes. Download the full app code (React frontend, Wasm backend) self-serve, no support ticket. Standard code fits Git and CI/CD, so a team can continue it in tools such as Codex or Claude Code.
Source: Betty Blocks release notes, June 2026; Betty Blocks announcement, December 2025
Unknown. Not yet sourced; the sample model scores Mendix Partial on exit, so test an export before relying on it.
Source: App Build Index sample model, October 2026
Partly. Data and schema can be extracted, but a third-party guide reports no runnable, maintainable source export, so leaving means a rebuild.
Source: RapidDev OutSystems migration guide, July 2026
Unknown. Solutions sync to Git for Dataverse environments; no standalone runtime export is described. The sample model scores Power Apps Weak on exit.
Source: Microsoft Learn, Git integration in Power Platform, October 2026; App Build Index sample model, October 2026
Yes. Two-way GitHub sync and, on paid plans, a full codebase download; the code can be deployed outside Lovable.
Source: Lovable docs, GitHub Git sync, October 2026
GovernanceStrong
Review SSO, audit and controls[1]
Strong
Structured delivery controls[1]
Strong
Enterprise delivery controls[1]
Strong
Microsoft tenant controls[1]
Weak
Validate controls per plan[1]
Hosting & dataStrong
Confirm EU contract scope[1]
Strong
Residency and processors to verify[1]
Strong
Residency and processors to verify[1]
Strong
Tenant region and connectors[1]
Weak
Check app and AI processors[1]
Deployment options
  • Managed cloud Public cloud hosting; apps can also move to a sovereign EU cloud.
  • Customer tenant Private cloud (optional).
  • On-premises Kubernetes/Docker installation in your own data center (optional).
  • Git push Download the full code and keep it in your own Git repository.
Source: Betty Blocks pricing, October 2026; Betty Blocks sovereignty page, October 2026
  • Managed cloud Unknown
  • Customer tenant Unknown
  • On-premises Unknown
  • Git push Unknown
Source: Not yet reviewed, October 2026
  • Managed cloud OutSystems Developer Cloud (ODC) runs on AWS.
  • Customer tenant Private cloud, depending on plan and architecture.
  • On-premises Depending on plan; OutSystems 11 can be self-hosted.
  • Git push Unknown for app source. Deployments are triggered from CI/CD tools through APIs.
Source: OutSystems deployment options, October 2026; RapidDev OutSystems migration guide, July 2026
  • Managed cloud Microsoft-hosted datacenter regions; the region is set when an environment is created.
  • Customer tenant Unknown
  • On-premises Unknown
  • Git push Solutions sync to GitHub or Azure DevOps, meant for developer environments rather than test or production.
Source: Microsoft Learn, datacenter regions, October 2026; Microsoft Learn, Git integration in Power Platform, October 2026
  • Managed cloud Hosted by Lovable on lovable.app or a custom domain.
  • Customer tenant Unknown
  • On-premises Unknown as a Lovable-run option.
  • Git push Two-way sync with GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Cloud and Enterprise Server; deploy outside Lovable from the repository.
Source: Lovable docs, hosting, October 2026; Lovable docs, GitHub Git sync, October 2026
Best forA governed route for business teams working with IT.[1]A structured environment for a mixed development team.[1]A route for complex applications owned by a delivery team.[1]A practical shortlist candidate in a Microsoft estate.[1]A fast starting point with a conventional code handover.[1]
Not forYour developers want to hand-write every line of code from day one.[1]You want to avoid specialist platform skills.[1]Your first priority is a small initial licence commitment.[1]You need a portable runtime outside that ecosystem.[1]You expect platform-managed enterprise controls by default.[1]
Exit / Betty Blocks vs OutSystems

Two ways out: exported code or a rebuild.

Betty Blocks apps export as standard React and WebAssembly code. Since June 2026 the full app code downloads self-serve, with no support ticket, so a team can keep running and extending it on its own infrastructure.

Source: Betty Blocks release notes, June 2026

OutSystems keeps the logic on its runtime.

A third-party migration guide reports that OutSystems apps compile to a proprietary runtime with no runnable source export. There is no maintainable code to take away, so leaving means a rebuild. Data and schema can be extracted.

Source: RapidDev OutSystems migration guide, July 2026

The same guide says OutSystems itself treats the move from OutSystems 11 to ODC as a rebuild of app logic. Read how to plan the OutSystems 11 to ODC rebuild →

Score your own exit with the exit scan →
Questions, answered

Before you decide.

Do I need an account or an email to see my result?

No. Your headline result appears immediately and updates as you change the inputs. Email is optional and only used if you ask for a report.

Are these vendor quotes or procurement advice?

No. This design edition uses clearly marked sample prices and weights. Use the assumptions panel to inspect the model, then get a written quote and verify controls with each vendor.

Where do my inputs go?

Calculations happen in your browser. A share link contains your answers, so share it only with people who should see them. The report form is a preview placeholder; it does not deliver email in this edition.

Sources & assumptions

  1. App Build Index sample research model, 14 October 2026. Prices and scores illustrate the interface and are not verified vendor offers.
  2. European Commission · AI Act framework. Reviewed 14 October 2026. Apply the rules to your exact use case with qualified advice.
A useful next step

Put your next decision in context.

Tell us what you are comparing and where you need clarity.

Design preview · No details are sent and no email is delivered.

Only the details you submit are included. Read our privacy notice.